The Southern Observer: April 2008

Friday, April 25, 2008

EUGENICS WATCH: Small Families and the Improvement of the Race.

REPRINT:

SEARCHLIGHTS ON HEALTHTHE SCIENCE OF EUGENICS
A Guide to Purity and Physical ManhoodAdvice to Maiden, Wife and MotherLove, Courtship, and Marriage
ByProf. B.G. Jefferis, M.D., PH. D.andJ.L. Nicols, A.M.With Excerpts from Well-Known AuthoritiesREV. LEONARD DAWSONDR. M.J. SAVAGEREV. H.R. HAWEISDR. PANCOASTDR. STALLDR. J.F. SCOTTDR. GEORGE NAPHEYSDR. STOCKHAMDR. T.D. NICHOLLSDR. R.L. DUGDALEDR. JOHN COWANDR. M.L. HOLBROOKPublished byJ.L. NICHOLS

Small Families and the Improvement of the Race.

1. Married People Must Decide for Themselves.—It is the fashion of those who marry nowadays to have few children, often none. Of course this is a matter which married people must decide for themselves. As is stated in an earlier chapter, sometimes this policy is the wisest that can be pursued.

2. Diseased people who are likely to beget only a sickly offspring, may follow this course, and so may thieves, rascals, vagabonds, insane and drunken persons, and all those who are likely to bring into the world beings that ought not to be here. But why so many well-to-do folks should pursue a policy adapted only to paupers and criminals, is not easy to explain. Why marry at all if not to found a family that shall live to bless and make glad the earth after father and mother are gone? It is not wise to rear too many children, nor is it wise to have too few. Properly brought up, they will make home a delight, and parents happy.

3. Population Limited.—Galton, in his great work on hereditary genius, observes that "the time may hereafter arrive in far distant years, when the population of this earth shall be kept as strictly within bounds of number and suitability of race, as the sheep of a well-ordered moor, or the plants in an orchard-house; in the meantime let us do what we can to encourage the multiplication of the races best fitted to invent and conform to a high and generous civilization."

[pg 233, ToC]
4. Shall Sickly People Raise Children?—The question whether sickly people should marry and propagate their kind, is briefly alluded to in an early chapter of this work. Where father and mother are both consumptive the chances are that the children will inherit physical weakness, which will result in the same disease, unless great pains are taken to give them a good physical education, and even then the probabilities are that they will find life a burden hardly worth living.

5. No Real Blessing.—Where one parent is consumptive and the other vigorous, the chances are just half as great. If there is a scrofulous or consumptive taint in the blood, beware! Sickly children are no comfort to their parents, no real blessing. If such people marry, they had better, in most cases, avoid parentage.

6. Welfare of Mankind.—The advancement of the welfare of mankind is a most intricate problem: all ought to refrain from marriage who cannot avoid abject poverty for their children; for poverty is not only a great evil, but tends to its own increase by leading to recklessness in marriage. On the other hand, as Mr. Galton has remarked, if the prudent avoid marriage, while the reckless marry, the inferior members will tend to supplant the better members of society.

7. Preventives.—Remember that the thousands of preventives which are advertised in papers, private circulars, etc., are not only inefficient, unreliable and worthless, but positively dangerous, and the annual mortality of females in this country from this cause alone is truly horrifying. Study nature, and nature's laws alone will guide you safely in the path of health and happiness.

8. Nature's Remedy.—Nature in her wise economy has prepared for overproduction, for during the period of pregnancy and nursing, and also most of the last half of each menstrual month, woman is naturally sterile; but this condition may become irregular and uncertain on account of stimulating drinks or immoral excesses.

12:14 PM | Permalink

Saturday, April 12, 2008

CREOLE TREATY RIGHTS

Creole Treaty Rights
An article from Gilbert Martin

On November 30, 1803, according to stipulations in the Louisiana Purchase Treaty and by formal action, the French rendered the entire Louisiana Territory an absolutely free country. And it remained that way until circa 1818, when the legislature of the newly formed state of Louisiana ruled otherwise. By those acts, in deliberate violation of the LPT, Louisiana became just another Jim Crow State in the Deep South.

At the time of the American takeover of the vast Louisiana Territory, tens of thousands of people with lineage to Africa were among the inhabitants. Some were free, but most were slaves. Nevertheless, neither free or slave was ever apprised of their treaty rights. Consequently, both the so-called free people of color and the slaves were forced to suffer the realities of degradation, hostility, and other forms of inequities brought about segregation, discrimination, racism and bigotry. Naturally, an undercurrent of resentment against the Americans flowed throughout the Creole community. And that resentment did not began to abate until after World War II. Prior to that war, the older Creoles did not refer to themselves as Americans.

They considered it an offense should anyone else referred to them as Americans. I saw many older Creoles spit on the ground after mentioning the word "Merican."

As a young Creole growing up during the Great Depression and the Jitterbug era, I didn’t know why my elders hated Americans so much. I was having fun. That did not concern me. So, it would be many decades before I would began to question the origin of my culture. I was fifty years old when my quest began. And another decade would past before I would come across a copy of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty. After reading the third article of the treaty, I finally understood why my people were so bitter. So, out of respect for them, I have been trying to bring the United States Government, and the state of California to task for treaty violations. Now, I would like the general public to find out about our plight under American domination.

Enclosed please find a copy of the letter I sent to Kevin Shelly, Secretary of State of California. I would like to have this information published, either in its entirety, in parts, or you may simply write about it. I feel that it’s very important for the Creole community, especially our young, to be apprised of our treaty rights, and to take this information seriously. I feel that it’s time for young Creoles to get involved. My struggle for authoritative recognition for Creole people has passed its third decade. Now, I am tired and should be taking it easy.

However, as a retired master builder, general contractor, and former member of the American Arbitration Association, I see the violation of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty as being the biggest blunder the United States has ever made. The U.S. received 908,380 square miles of territory for $15 million and to provide and guarantee to us, civil and special rights as stipulated in Article III of the treaty. But up until now, the federal government has been acting as if the Louisiana Purchase Treaty is a unilateral instrument. Contrarily, the LPT is a bilateral instrument and must be regarded as such.

Therefore, I have chosen to stand on the opposite, and uncontested, side of the LPT. Therefore, I am calling upon the federal government and all state governments to acknowledge their legal obligations under the LPT, and to repair any and all damage for any and all infractions thereof. Please provide me with whatever help that you can. If there is any question you would like me to answer, or any subject that you would like me to address, don’t hesitate to contact me.

Also, I have enclosed a copy of the certified letter that I sent to Bill Lockyer, Attorney General for the state of California.

Yours truly,

Gilbert E. Martin

12:53 PM | Permalink

LIBRARIAN FIRED FOR TURNING IN PEDOPHILE!

Originally Published by The John Birch Society - Truth, Leadership, Freedom (http://www.jbs.org/)

Librarian Fired for Turning in Pedophile
By Dr. John Fisher
Created 2008-04-09 14:33

ARTICLE SYNOPSIS:
A librarian in Lindsay, California was fired when she disobeyed orders of superiors who told her to ignore a patron who was looking at child pornography on library computers. Instead she called police who charged the man after finding his home computer also contained child pornography.

Follow this link to the original source: "Librarian in nation's headlines [1]"

COMMENTARY:
The website for local newspapers, The Visalia Times-Delta and Tulare Advance-Register, reported how this incident has changed librarian Brenda Biesterfeld’s life and brought unwanted notoriety to the community.

Biesterfeld said she is overwhelmed by the media attention, though she has heard little of what's being said about her situation online.

"When I decided to go to the police, I could not foresee this was going to happen," she said. "I was just doing the right thing, I thought, as an employee and a mother and a citizen."

On CNN, Glenn Beck interviewed Matthew Staver, Brenda Biesterfeld’s attorney
Staver said, "She didn`t do anything wrong. She did the moral and legal possibility that all of us would do, when they saw something like this."

"She was working in the library…. And she saw this individual viewing child pornography. Not just any pornography, child pornography. When she reported it to [her supervisor], she just said, ‘Give him a warning, and if he does it again, he can`t come back.’"

"Well, it disturbed her so much... she called the police. They said, ‘If he comes back again, call us, let us know.’"

“He came back again. He viewed pornography of children again. She called the police. When they arrived, they caught him in the act of viewing child pornography, and they arrested him. They searched his home, found child pornography on his home computer."

According to Staver, her supervisor claimed it was a "privacy issue." Two days later, the county library fired Biesterfeld, who was close to ending a six month probationary period.
Viewing child pornography is not a privacy right, whether in one’s home or in the public library. It’s a crime. Biesterfeld did the right and moral thing in reporting this crime.

As Ann Shibler wrote [1] in this column:

Our Founding Fathers never intended that such detestable crimes have the protection of the Constitution when they approved the Bill of Rights containing the First Amendment. In modern parlance, it's more than a bit of a stretch to think that the Founding Fathers would condone the sexual exploitation of children under the heading of ‘free speech.’ That is why they left moral legislation up to the states.

Dr. John Fisher [1]
Dr. John Fisher teaches communications and researches in the area of mass media and political decision making.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.jbs.org/trackback/7636
Source URL:http://www.jbs.org/node/7636
Links:[1] http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080318/NEWS01/803180318/1002/NEWS01[2] http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://www.jbs.org/node/7636&title=Librarian+Fired+for+Turning+in+Pedophile[3] http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.jbs.org/node/7636[4] http://www.newsvine.com/_tools/seed&save?u=http://www.jbs.org/node/7636&h=Librarian+Fired+for+Turning+in+Pedophile[5] http://technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://www.jbs.org/node/7636

12:47 PM | Permalink

MLK LT. CONVICTED OF INCEST

Martin Luther King Jnr Adviser On Trial For Incest

Jury convicts civil rights leader on incest chargeWZTV, TN - Apr 11, 2008(AP) -- A Virginia jury has recommended that a civil rights figure who was a lieutenant of Martin Luther King be sentenced to 15 years in prison for incest. ...

HERE'S ANOTHER STORY:

Va. jury convicts MLK confidant Bevel of incest with his daughterMohave Valley News, NV - Apr 11, 2008(AP) - A jury convicted an iconic civil-rights figure of incest Thursday after concluding that he had sex with his teenage daughter 15 years ago. The Rev. ...

12:32 PM | Permalink

SCHOOL FRAUD

This is a true & FULLY documented accounting of a R.I.C.O. coverup of violent crimes against children by Arkansas' Pulaski County Special School District ( PCSSD ) & Pulaski County Sheriff's Office:

Please click here to read what the Department of Education Has to say about these heinous claims.

These heinous acts occurred under the auspices and direction of academic adults charged with the safety and education of our American Creole children.

This public trust was severely violated. Arkansas State Prosecutor Larry Jegley has ignored the blatent criminal evidence against these corrupt officials, even though the Arkansas Department of Education has provided him with ALL of the proof he could ever need.

Instead, he only prosecutes two TOKEN criminal student participants and let's all the others go so they can cover up the REAL crime:

PUBLIC CORRUPTION & JUDICIAL FRAUD

THE TRUTH ON TAPE!!!!!!!!!!! Please Click HERE!!!!! https://www.sharemation.com/xythoswfs/webview/_xy-1489107_files

Brought to you by The American Creole Indian Nation & PCSSD Fraud Watch

AS OF TODAY, ONLY TWO OF OVER TWENTY (20) GANG MEMBERS HAVE BEEN TRIED AND CONVICTED SOLELY UPON THE IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE COLLECTED BY CREOLES AND OFFERED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES & THE LOCAL MEDIA.
https://www.sharemation.com/xythoswfs/webview/_xy-1489107_files

FINAL NOTICE OF PARENTAL ACTION <--(Audio & Documentation Link- PLEASE CLICK LINK)

Case Number(s): IN-2004-2283

NAMES: Serenity Goodwin Complainant

Turner Goodwin Complainant

Stacey Goodwin Mother of Complainant

Shaneka Cloud Defendant

Venita Williams Aunt of Defendant, Guardian

Wanzer Adams Aunt of Defendant (Fraudulent DHS Employee), Guardian

Attn: YOUTH MEDIATION PROJECT
U.A.L.R. BOWEN SCHOOL OF LAW

RE: Agreement To Mediate, Per Confidentiality Exceptions: “ANY INFORMATION ABOUT CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT, SUICIDE OR THREATS OF HARM TO ANOTHER WILL NOT BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL" & PRACTICING LAW OUTSIDE OF MEDIATOR CHARGE

Note: the following statements are made under appropriate penalties of perjury and defamation and/or slander. My children and I are also ready willing and prepared to submit ourselves to polygraph examination in extended efforts to further corroborate our factual claims and clarify the scope of what we have witnessed this day. Any statement(s) in response to this notice MUST carry the exact same attestation or shall not be acknowledge as a valid and credible response to this valid notice now in force.

In light of the following, please find that it is a:

1. Fact, that in the presence of Mediator Nancy W. Mathews, Defendant Shaneka Cloud did confess and implicate co-gang member Sholanda Gilliam, to being both members of the street and school gang C.A.S.H. (Check All Silly Hoes), of which she gang imported Louisiana interstate to Arkansas and established with “three members”. She also admits fighting for her “sisters” in Louisiana.

2. Fact, Defendant did stipulate to and verbally waived contest of Complainant Serenity Goodwin’s accounting of the events in question.

3. Fact, Defendant did admit to developing the idea to commit her assault against Complainant after she believed Complainant was associated with a “rumor” at Fuller Middle School.

4. Fact, Defendant did confess to initiating by confronting Complainant Alex Goodwin and issued threats of violence to both him as well as his sister, Complainant Serenity Goodwin.

5. Fact, Defendant did confess to then confronting Complainant Serenity Goodwin at the bus stop with additional threats of physical harm.

6. Fact, when confronted with evidence, Defendant did stipulate that she did indeed make additional threats to physically harm Serenity Goodwin in the presence of three employees of Fuller Middle School.

7. Fact, Mother of Complainants did indeed give an accounting of additional threats of physical harm against said Complainants.

8. Fact, Defendant did stipulate that she was indeed present when explicatives and threats of murder, “Bitch, we’re gonna’ slit yo’ throat!”, were being yelled from a moving vehicle being driven by a male. She further verbally implicated her “sister”/co-gang member as uttering the actual death threat to “slit Complainant’s throat”.

9. Fact, Defendant did offer that she did no want to “fight” the Complainant but she was obligated by her “sister”/co-gang member Sholanda Gilliam.

10. Fact, Defendant did implicate Sholanda Gilliam as the initiator of all threats on the bus and Defendant claims that she simply laughed in support of her “sister’s” threats.

11. Fact, Defendant did implicate Sholanda Gilliam as departing from bus, following Complainant Serenity and striking the Complaint from behind, then hitting Complainant from behind a second time as Complainant was attempting to avoid the melee.

12. Fact, Defendant confessed that she then struck the Complainant from behind, but did not know how the Complainant fell.

13. Fact, Defendant admits that in the presence of numerous witnesses they then began to chase the Complainant to her house after the Complainant escaped their melee.

14. Fact, Mother of Complainant then testifies that additional death threats were made in the presence of numerous witnesses outside of her home as the Defendant and her gang confronted the mother and demanded that she allow them to physically harm her child while yelling threats of death.

15. Fact, when confronted by credible witness accounts, the Defendant did indeed further stipulate that she did indeed trespass upon church property with the specific intention of making even more additional threats of physical harm to Complainant Serenity Goodwin specifically.

16. Fact, that in the presence of Mediator, the Aunt of Defendant indicated that even the administration at Fuller Middle School agreed that if a specific “Adult” would have just stayed out of it, the kids could have worked it out “by themselves.”

17. Fact, Aunt then backpedaled and futilely attempted to recant her questionable statements that directly implicated the Fuller Middle School Administration. After Mediator verbally disagreed with Aunt of Defendant’s questionable statements, Mediator ordered the Complainants out of the room. When the Complainants returned, The Aunt of the Defendant then attempted to request that all statements made by her that implicated the Fuller Middle School Administration remain in the room, and struck from record. She expressed a concern that they (Fuller Middle School Administration) might become aware of her “slip of the lip” before being summarily stopped by the Mediator in her effort to prevent the Aunt of Defendant from implicating third parties even further as it pertains to their motives. In summary, advising the Defendant to remain silent about that specific matter of the mediation, outside of Mediator charge. [You know, PRACTICING LAW (in a very anti-Creole sorta' way) in a so-called mediation. Hint- that's illegal both FED & State]

18. Fact, Defendant additionally indicated that her motivation for harming Complainant, Serenity Goodwin was the defensive marks that her “sister” Sholanda received upon her face in their attempt to seriously harm Complainant, Serenity Goodwin.

ACTION

I, Stacey Goodwin find that in light of the lack of remorse and refusal to cease threats to commit 1st degree murder against my only daughter by repeated threats to “slit” her throat, please find the following:

1. We fully intend to press forward with the State criminal prosecution of Shaneka Cloud & Sholanda Gilliam including but not limited to how it relates to her documented gang activities and her participation in the Fuller Middle School Gang Cover-up and her various felonious activities associated. Ms. Mathews, please refer this case to Terry forthwith as promised.

2. In light of the documented threats to commit murder against Serenity Goodwin, I shall be filing additional State and Federal Complaints against the other identified participants as it pertains to these matters including recommendations for criminal/civil investigations specifically and generally of Fuller Middle School Administration, including but not limited to aiding/abetting delinquency of minors, criminal/civil negligence and criminal/civil RICO.

3. Mediator, I fully expect you to comply with all Federal and State statutes mandating you to immediately report all threats of harm as evidenced this day. I shall be contacting you in one business day to confirm that said actions have been implemented forthwith.

Again, thank you in advance.
Stacey Goodwin, pro per 1-07-05

UPDATE:

ONLY TWO GANG MEMBERS HAVE BEEN TRIED AND CONVICTED SOLELY UPON THE IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE COLLECTED BY CREOLES AND OFFERED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES & THE LOCAL MEDIA.

__________________________________________________________
JIM CROW IS ALIVE AND KICKIN' IN ARKANSAS LOOK AT THIS CRAP:

UALR
William H. Bowen School of Law
Clinical Programs

Stacey Goodwin
8A Harris Circle
Little Rock, AR 72206

Dear Ms. Goodwin:

On May 12, it was brought to the attention of the mediation program that your web blog includes references to the details of the mediation that you participated in on January. Mediation in the State of Arkansas is confidential, according to state law.

Additionally, in the Agreement to Mediate that was discussed and that you signed at the start of the mediation, you agreed to keep the mediation discussions confidential. A blank copy of the Agreement to Mediate and a copy of Arkansas’s mediation confidentiality statute are attached.

The confidentiality exception referenced by the Agreement to Mediate refers to the fact that the mediator may but is not required to report on threats of harm made during the mediation. Discussions regarding any previous threats are protected by the confidentiality statute.

Therefore, your internet publication of specifics of the mediation is in conflict with the statute and the Agreement to Mediate. We respectfully ask that you[r] remove any mention of mediation discussions from the blog. We also ask that you refrain from all future publication or discussions from your blog. We also ask that you refrain from all future publication or discussion of the mediation. You may comment on the incidents that happened that led to the mediation, or your reaction to the mediation, but not what occurred during mediation.

If you have any questions regarding the law or the Agreement to Mediate, please contact our office.

Sincerely,

Kelly Browe Olson
Director of Clinical Programs

[OK, that was Jim Crow interesting...but, what about your mediator practicing law up-in-there, pretty ONE-SIDED to me, hungh? Ain't that just a TAD bit illegal (State & Fed BTW)?

And WHY was this OBVIOUS gang victim case SENT over to you guys anyway (cover-up?) when it should have been vigorously PROSECUTED FORTHWITH AS REQUIRED BY STATE L-A-W-S?

[AH, The invisible American Creole Indian thang ONCE again, yep, that's what me thinks. We're here!]

12:11 PM | Permalink

SCHOOL FRAUD

These heinous acts occurred under the auspices and direction of academic adults charged with the safety and education of our American Creole children.

Instead, he only prosecutes two TOKEN criminal student participants and let's all the others go so they can cover up the REAL crime:

PUBLIC CORRUPTION & JUDICIAL FRAUD

THE TRUTH ON TAPE!!!!!!!!!!! Please Click HERE!!!!! https://www.sharemation.com/xythoswfs/webview/_xy-1489107_files

Brought to you by The American Creole Indian Nation & PCSSD Fraud Watch

12:06 PM | Permalink

Monday, April 07, 2008

Innocent People Aren’t Required To Identify Themselves, And Police Have No Authority To Arrest Them

-Qualified immunity protects public officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have,” the court said, adding that the trooper “acted contrary to the plain meaning” of the state statute.

...hmm, makes sense to me, I wonder what Pulaski County Sheriff's Office thinks about that?

p.s. Jim Crow Sucks

Ean Bordeaux, pro per
Creole Intrests Reporter
Citizen Complainant

-E pluribus Unum

8th Circuit Federal Court Of Appeals Rules That Innocent People Aren’t Required To Identify Themselves, And Police Have No Authority To Arrest Them If They Don’t

Posted by Admin
Published in ARKANSAS

LITTLE ROCK, AR - A police officer does not have the authority to arrest someone for refusing to identify himself when he is not suspected of committing a crime, a federal appeals panel ruled Friday.

The decision by a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis reversed an Arkansas federal judge’s ruling and ordered a new hearing in a Benton County man’s lawsuit challenging his arrest for refusing to show his identification during a traffic stop.

Read The Full Article

9:49 AM | Permalink